Peer+Review+for+Group+4

How much amount of hydrogen gas will be produced by the reaction between magnesium and hydrochloric acid?
This is a very good science report. It's great that you have pictures after each material to give the reader a visual image of the material used. Also, your tables and graphs are very well organized in terms of easily interpreting them. One suggestion that I have for this group is to use more scientific words when writing your report. If I were you, I would read through your report and correct some of the words so that they are more scientific.

-Kyle

Faline: It is a nice report. I like the way you put a lot of pictures, but i think you forgot to link the pictures that you uploaded. Also, i think you should have a continuous font for your lab report. For example, the font for "title", "hypothesis", and "aim or question" is smaller than the others( "variables", "materials "etc.) It should be the same size as the others. It will look better if you change the errors.

I think this is a very well-written lab report. The size of the material pictures were good-looking, and the hypothesis mentions and explains about the collision theory, which i thought it was easy to understand. I think this lab report will look awesome if smarter word choices are made. -Cara-

Nice report Group 4! The diagrams were pretty neat, and I like how you used pictures for each material in the apparatus section to clarify what was needed. However, I think the graphs were a bit too big, and you should try not to use personal pronouns such as "we, our, us" in your lab, particularly in the conclusion.

-Shao-Yan

I liked how you included pictures with each material, it made the lab report look better overall. The conclusion and evaluation are well written and gave good insights on your experiments and your reflection on how you did. However, you should change the personal pronouns you used (mainly 'our') and also correct the picture of the flask next to your procedure because it is very blurry. Also, I think that it's best if you stick to one consistent font size for your titles throughout the report. /Charles

Well done group 4! I agree that this is a good report especially the method section. Although incorrectly labeled, the method is clear and concise and would be easy for me to reproduce the same exact expiriment you guys conducted. The variables are related correctly in the steps and the 2 different tests are also labeled which helps the reader to see the different parts of the testing stages. I also think the pictures included with the materials helps to create a good visual image for people who don't know what some of the more complicated items are or had never seen them before. Formatting though might have been an issue as you titles and headings weren't all the same size and that makes the report look a little bit sloppy, but overall good job! =) ---Chris

Nice job on your report. Your experiment method is clearly detailed, and can enable the reader to reproduce your exact experiment. Also, the images you included can help give the reader a visual image of exactly what they would need to do. However, you left out a few things, such as the balanced chemical and word equations, and some formatting, but your overall report compensates for them. Conclusion was well written, and covered many of the possible experimental or random errors that could have occurred.

-Richie